Effect of (quasi-)optimum model parameter sets and model characteristics on future discharge projection of two basins from Europe and Asia

A. Chamorro (), P. Kraft, G. Pauer, J.-F. Exbrayat and L. Breuer
Additional contact information
A. Chamorro: Justus Liebig University
P. Kraft: Justus Liebig University
G. Pauer: Justus Liebig University
J.-F. Exbrayat: University of Edinburgh
L. Breuer: Justus Liebig University

Climatic Change, 2017, vol. 142, issue 3, No 19, 559-573

Abstract: Abstract Uncertainty is an inherent, unavoidable feature in the modeling of natural processes. This is particularly a sensitive issue when dealing with forecasting, especially in the context of climate change impacts. Apart from the uncertainty introduced by different climate projections, additional sources of uncertainty have been acknowledged in the literature: driving models, input information, regionalization, parameter choice, downscaling techniques, among others. In this study, we focus as primary goal on the uncertainty introduced by various set of parameters in the twenty-first century projections of runoff in two large river basins: the Rhine in Europe and the Ganges in Asia. For this purpose, we apply a robust parameter estimation optimization algorithm to account for the uncertainty given by a quasi-optimum parameter set choice. A total of 1000 robust and well-performing parameter sets are found and applied for uncertainty analysis. Here we analyze how much discharge projections diverge, given sets of parameters with similar performance. Results suggest that parameter uncertainty is strongly related to model complexity in both basins. To contrast this uncertainty with other important sources, five general circulation models together with four climate change emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways, RCP) are analyzed. Two hydrological models are used as well to test the impact of model conception on uncertainty. Results show that the contribution of parameter choice to uncertainty for the Ganges is rather stable in time and comparatively small for the periods 2006 to 2035, 2036 to 2065, and 2070 to 2099. In the case of Rhine, results are more heterogeneous and change over time, with increasing importance of GCM/RCPs toward the end of the century. Major differences are attributable to GCMs ranging from 60 to 80% followed by RCPs in the range 12–30%, whereas differences due to parameter sets range from 3 to 8%.

Keywords: Hydrological Model; Parameter Uncertainty; Depth Function; Couple Model Intercomparison Project Phase; Representative Concentration Pathway (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-017-1974-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:142:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-017-1974-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1974-4

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().