EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems

Heleen L. van Soest (), Harmen Sytze de Boer, Mark Roelfsema, Michel G.J. den Elzen, Annemiek Admiraal, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Andries F. Hof, Maarten van den Berg, Mathijs J.H.M. Harmsen, David E.H.J. Gernaat and Nicklas Forsell
Additional contact information
Heleen L. van Soest: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Harmen Sytze de Boer: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Mark Roelfsema: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Michel G.J. den Elzen: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Annemiek Admiraal: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Detlef P. van Vuuren: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Andries F. Hof: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Maarten van den Berg: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Mathijs J.H.M. Harmsen: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
David E.H.J. Gernaat: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Nicklas Forsell: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

Climatic Change, 2017, vol. 144, issue 2, No 7, 165-179

Abstract: Abstract The IMAGE integrated assessment model was used to develop a set of scenarios to evaluate the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted by Parties under the Paris Agreement. The scenarios project emissions and energy system changes under (i) current policies, (ii) implementation of the NDCs, and (iii) various trajectories to a radiative forcing level of 2.8 W/m2 in 2100, which gives a probability of about two thirds to limit warming to below 2 °C. The scenarios show that a cost-optimal pathway from 2020 onwards towards 2.8 W/m2 leads to a global greenhouse gas emission level of 38 gigatonne CO2 equivalent (GtCO2eq) by 2030, equal to a reduction of 20% compared to the 2010 level. The NDCs are projected to lead to 2030 emission levels of 50 GtCO2eq, which is still an increase compared to the 2010 level. A scenario that achieves the 2.8 W/m2 forcing level in 2100 from the 2030 NDC level requires more rapid transitions after 2030 to meet the forcing target. It shows an annual reduction rate in greenhouse gas emissions of 4.7% between 2030 and 2050, rapidly phasing out unabated coal-fired power plant capacity, more rapid scale-up of low-carbon energy, and higher mitigation costs. A bridge scenario shows that enhancing the ambition level of NDCs before 2030 allows for a smoother energy system transition, with average annual emission reduction rates of 4.5% between 2030 and 2050, and more time to phase out coal capacity.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:144:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-017-2027-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-17
Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:144:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-017-2027-8