Impact of intensive fish farming on methane emission in a tropical hydropower reservoir

Marcelo Gomes Silva, Ana Paula Packer (), Fernanda G. Sampaio, Luciano Marani, Ericka V. C. Mariano, Ricardo A. A. Pazianotto, Willian J. Ferreira and Plínio C. Alvalá
Additional contact information
Marcelo Gomes Silva: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
Ana Paula Packer: Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA)
Fernanda G. Sampaio: Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA)
Luciano Marani: Nacional Institute for Space Research (Inpe)
Ericka V. C. Mariano: Alagoas Federal University
Ricardo A. A. Pazianotto: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
Willian J. Ferreira: Nacional Institute for Space Research (Inpe)
Plínio C. Alvalá: Nacional Institute for Space Research (Inpe)

Climatic Change, 2018, vol. 150, issue 3, No 5, 195-210

Abstract: Abstract Fisheries and aquaculture are important sources of food for hundreds of millions of people around the world. World fish production is projected to increase by 15% in the next 10 years, reaching around 200 million tonnes per year. The main driver of this increase will be based on fish farming management in developing countries. In Brazil, fish farming is increasing due to the climate conditions and large supply of water resources, with the production system based on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) farming in reservoirs. Inland waters like reservoirs are a natural source of methane (CH4) to the atmosphere. However, knowledge of the impact from intensive fish production in net cages on CH4 fluxes is not well known. This paper presents in situ measurements of CH4 fluxes and dissolved CH4 (DM) in the Furnas Hydroelectric Reservoir in order to evaluate the impact of fish farming on methane emissions. Measurements were taken in a control area without fish production and three areas with fish farming. The overall mean of diffusive methane flux (DMF) (5.9 ± 4.5 mg CH4 m−2 day−1) was significantly lower when compared to the overall mean of bubble methane flux (BMF) (552.9 ± 1003.9 mg CH4 m−2 day−1). The DMF and DM were significantly higher in the two areas with fish farming, whereas the BMF was not significantly different. The DMF and DM were correlated to depth and chlorophyll-a. However, the low production of BMF did not allow the comparison with the limnological parameters measured. This case study shows that CH4 emissions are influenced more by reservoir characteristics than fish production. Further investigation is necessary to assess the impact of fish farming on the greenhouse gas emissions.

Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-018-2281-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:150:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-018-2281-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-018-2281-4

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().