Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change
Theodore G. Shepherd (),
Emily Boyd (),
Raphael Calel,
Sandra C. Chapman (),
Suraje Dessai (),
Ioana M. Dima-West (),
Hayley J. Fowler (),
Rachel James (),
Douglas Maraun (),
Olivia Martius (),
Catherine A. Senior (),
Adam H. Sobel (),
David A. Stainforth (),
Simon F. B. Tett (),
Kevin E. Trenberth (),
Bart J. J. M. Hurk (),
Nicholas W. Watkins (),
Robert L. Wilby () and
Dimitri A. Zenghelis ()
Additional contact information
Theodore G. Shepherd: University of Reading
Emily Boyd: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies
Sandra C. Chapman: University of Warwick
Suraje Dessai: University of Leeds
Ioana M. Dima-West: Willis Re
Hayley J. Fowler: Newcastle University
Rachel James: University of Oxford
Douglas Maraun: University of Graz
Olivia Martius: University of Bern
Catherine A. Senior: Met Office
Adam H. Sobel: Columbia University
David A. Stainforth: London School of Economics
Simon F. B. Tett: University of Edinburgh
Kevin E. Trenberth: National Center for Atmospheric Research
Bart J. J. M. Hurk: Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI)
Nicholas W. Watkins: London School of Economics
Robert L. Wilby: Loughborough University
Dimitri A. Zenghelis: London School of Economics
Climatic Change, 2018, vol. 151, issue 3, No 13, 555-571
Abstract:
Abstract As climate change research becomes increasingly applied, the need for actionable information is growing rapidly. A key aspect of this requirement is the representation of uncertainties. The conventional approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change is probabilistic, based on ensembles of climate model simulations. In the face of deep uncertainties, the known limitations of this approach are becoming increasingly apparent. An alternative is thus emerging which may be called a ‘storyline’ approach. We define a storyline as a physically self-consistent unfolding of past events, or of plausible future events or pathways. No a priori probability of the storyline is assessed; emphasis is placed instead on understanding the driving factors involved, and the plausibility of those factors. We introduce a typology of four reasons for using storylines to represent uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change: (i) improving risk awareness by framing risk in an event-oriented rather than a probabilistic manner, which corresponds more directly to how people perceive and respond to risk; (ii) strengthening decision-making by allowing one to work backward from a particular vulnerability or decision point, combining climate change information with other relevant factors to address compound risk and develop appropriate stress tests; (iii) providing a physical basis for partitioning uncertainty, thereby allowing the use of more credible regional models in a conditioned manner and (iv) exploring the boundaries of plausibility, thereby guarding against false precision and surprise. Storylines also offer a powerful way of linking physical with human aspects of climate change.
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-018-2317-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:151:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-018-2317-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-018-2317-9
Access Statistics for this article
Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe
More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().