Quantifying student engagement in learning about climate change using galvanic hand sensors in a controlled educational setting
A. L. Morrison (),
S. Rozak,
A. U. Gold and
J. E. Kay
Additional contact information
A. L. Morrison: University of Colorado Boulder
S. Rozak: Pikes Peak Community College
A. U. Gold: University of Colorado Boulder
J. E. Kay: University of Colorado Boulder
Climatic Change, 2020, vol. 159, issue 1, No 2, 17-36
Abstract:
Abstract Teaching climate change is complex because it requires a system-level understanding of many science disciplines and also because students may have preconceptions about climate change. Previous work shows students learn and retain science content better when they are engaged in the learning process. Active learning strategies engage students in learning science, but the engagement impact of active learning has not yet been assessed in a controlled environment using both biometric and self-reporting tools. Here, we analyze 52 university students’ engagement during several common active learning strategies in a controlled research setting. We collected biometric data from all participants with hand sensors that measured changes in skin conductance as a proxy for engagement. Participants self-reported their engagement as a control. The combined biometric and self-reported data show that skin conductance data matched self-reported engagement, confirming that skin conductance is a robust proxy for engagement. Overall, dialog was the most engaging activity, with engagement levels about 165% above baseline. Non-science majors had higher average engagement than science majors (137% vs. 53% above baseline, respectively). Notably, skin conductance data showed no statistically significant differences based on participants’ political or religious affiliations. In summary, our results demonstrate biometric sensors’ potential to measure and monitor engagement in a learning environment. Relevant for climate education, in-class dialog increases student engagement in learning climate science and is especially effective for non-science majors.
Keywords: Active learning; Climate change; Higher education; Geoscience education; Student engagement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-019-02576-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:159:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-019-02576-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-019-02576-6
Access Statistics for this article
Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe
More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().