EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Impacts of hydrological model calibration on projected hydrological changes under climate change—a multi-model assessment in three large river basins

Shaochun Huang (), Harsh Shah, Bibi S. Naz, Narayan Shrestha, Vimal Mishra, Prasad Daggupati, Uttam Ghimire and Tobias Vetter
Additional contact information
Shaochun Huang: The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE)
Harsh Shah: Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
Bibi S. Naz: Juelich Research Center GmbH, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences: Agrosphere (IBG 3)
Narayan Shrestha: University of Guelph
Vimal Mishra: Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
Prasad Daggupati: University of Guelph
Uttam Ghimire: University of Guelph
Tobias Vetter: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

Climatic Change, 2020, vol. 163, issue 3, No 2, 1143-1164

Abstract: Abstract This study aimed to investigate the influence of hydrological model calibration/validation on discharge projections for three large river basins (the Rhine, Upper Mississippi and Upper Yellow). Three hydrological models (HMs), which have been firstly calibrated against the monthly discharge at the outlet of each basin (simple calibration), were re-calibrated against the daily discharge at the outlet and intermediate gauges under contrast climate conditions simultaneously (enhanced calibration). In addition, the models were validated in terms of hydrological indicators of interest (median, low and high flows) as well as actual evapotranspiration in the historical period. The models calibrated using both calibration methods were then driven by the same bias corrected climate projections from five global circulation models (GCMs) under four Representative Concentration Pathway scenarios (RCPs). The hydrological changes of the indicators were represented by the ensemble median, ensemble mean and ensemble weighted means of all combinations of HMs and GCMs under each RCP. The results showed moderate (5–10%) to strong influence (> 10%) of the calibration methods on the ensemble medians/means for the Mississippi, minor to moderate (up to 10%) influence for the Yellow and minor (

Keywords: Runoff quantile; SWAT; SWIM; VIC; ANOVA analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-020-02872-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:163:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-020-02872-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-020-02872-6

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:163:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-020-02872-6