Effect of model calibration strategy on climate projections of hydrological indicators at a continental scale

Yeshewatesfa Hundecha (), Berit Arheimer, Peter Berg, René Capell, Jude Musuuza, Ilias Pechlivanidis and Christiana Photiadou
Additional contact information
Yeshewatesfa Hundecha: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Berit Arheimer: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Peter Berg: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
René Capell: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Jude Musuuza: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Ilias Pechlivanidis: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Christiana Photiadou: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute

Climatic Change, 2020, vol. 163, issue 3, No 9, 1287-1306

Abstract: Abstract The effect of model calibration on the projection of climate change impact on hydrological indicators was assessed by employing variants of a pan-European hydrological model driven by forcing data from an ensemble of climate models. The hydrological model was calibrated using three approaches: calibration at the outlets of major river basins, regionalization through calibration of smaller scale catchments with unique catchment characteristics, and building a model ensemble by sampling model parameters from the regionalized model. The large-scale patterns of the change signals projected by all model variants were found to be similar for the different indicators. Catchment scale differences were observed between the projections of the model calibrated for the major river basins and the other two model variants. The distributions of the median change signals projected by the ensemble model were found to be similar to the distributions of the change signals projected by the regionalized model for all hydrological indicators. The study highlights that the spatial detail to which model calibration is performed can highly influence the catchment scale detail in the projection of climate change impact on hydrological indicators, with an absolute difference in the projections of the locally calibrated model and the model calibrated for the major river basins ranging between 0 and 55% for mean annual discharge, while it has little effect on the large-scale pattern of the projection.

Keywords: Model calibration; HYPE; Climate change; Europe; Ensemble modeling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-020-02874-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:163:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-020-02874-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-020-02874-4

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().