Weighting climate models for hydrological projections: effects on contrasting hydroclimatic regions

Mariana Castaneda-Gonzalez (), Annie Poulin, Rabindranarth Romero-Lopez and Richard Turcotte
Additional contact information
Mariana Castaneda-Gonzalez: École de Technologie Supérieure
Annie Poulin: École de Technologie Supérieure
Rabindranarth Romero-Lopez: Universidad Veracruzana
Richard Turcotte: Environnement Et Lutte Contre Les Changements Climatiques

Climatic Change, 2023, vol. 176, issue 12, No 12, 24 pages

Abstract: Abstract Weighting climate models has recently become a more accepted approach. However, it remains a topic of ongoing discussion, especially for analyses needed at regional scales, such as hydrological assessments. Various studies have evaluated the weighting approaches for climate simulations. Yet, few case studies have assessed the impacts of weighting climate models on streamflow projections. Additionally, the methodological and location limitations of previous studies make it difficult to extrapolate their conclusions over regions with contrasting hydroclimatic regimes, highlighting the need for further studies. Thus, this study evaluates the effects of different climate model’s weighting approaches on hydrological projections over hydrologically diverse basins. An ensemble of 24 global climate model (GCM) simulations coupled with a lumped hydrological model is used over 20 North American basins to generate 24 GCM-driven streamflow projections. Six unequal-weighting approaches, comprising temperature-, precipitation-, and streamflow-based criteria, were evaluated using an out-of-sample approach during the 1976–2005 reference period. Moreover, the unequal-weighting approaches were compared against the equal-weighting approach over the 1976–2005, 2041–2070, and 2070–2099 periods. The out-of-sample assessment showed that unequally weighted ensembles can improve the mean hydrograph representation under historical conditions compared to the common equal-weighting approach. In addition, results revealed that unequally weighting climate models not only impacted the magnitude and climate change signal, but also reduced the model response uncertainty spread of hydrological projections, particularly over rain-dominated basins. These results underline the need to further evaluate the adequacy of equally weighting climate models, especially for variables with generally larger uncertainty at regional scale.

Keywords: Climate models weighting; Hydrological projections; Climate change impacts; Contrasting hydroclimatic regions; Hydrological ensemble weighting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-023-03643-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:176:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1007_s10584-023-03643-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-023-03643-9

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().