Grounding the conversation on loss and damage: insights from sense-making analysis with Pacific leaders

Stephen Woroniecki, Pamela Feetham, Björn-Ola Linnér, Api Movono, Priyatma Singh, Franco Vaccarino, Victoria Wibeck () and Kristin Zeiler
Additional contact information
Stephen Woroniecki: Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change/Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research
Pamela Feetham: Massey University
Björn-Ola Linnér: Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change/Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research
Api Movono: Massey University
Priyatma Singh: University of Fiji
Franco Vaccarino: Massey University
Victoria Wibeck: Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change/Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research
Kristin Zeiler: Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies – Technology and Social Change

Climatic Change, 2025, vol. 178, issue 11, No 3, 21 pages

Abstract: Abstract The concept of Loss and Damage (L&D) is gaining increased attention within and outside of international climate negotiations, and by a broader array of actors looking to address the personal, practical, and political changes wrought by the impacts of climate change. While the original use of the term has developed within the international negotiations, the concept is increasingly tasked with making sense of, and dealing with, the impacts of climate change at national and local levels. In this context, there is a need to understand how the concept of L&D relates to people’s experiences of and potential responses to the impacts of climate change. We address this gap by drawing on dialogical sense-making analysis, that highlights how language both shapes, and is shaped by, the social interactions in which it is used. Our in-depth qualitative analysis builds on ten conversations with Pacific leaders familiar with Loss and Damage in international discussions as well as national and local-level experiences of actually-occurring losses and damages. We show how the depth and range of experiences that people articulate are often at odds with the meanings associated with the concept of Loss and Damage, which are primarily orientated towards the international climate negotiations. We therefore question whether and how the concept is relevant to these experiences and forms of sense-making. Grounding the concept of L&D will require attention to the kinds of conversations it is enabling, and how they can become more inclusive of plural perspectives, needs, knowledges and values.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-04032-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s10584-025-04032-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-04032-0

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().