EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

What the new loss and damage fund needs for public approval: choice experimental evidence from Austria

Florian Bottner (), Viktoria Jansesberger, Markus Ohndorf, Gabriele Spilker and Robert Steiger
Additional contact information
Florian Bottner: University of Innsbruck
Viktoria Jansesberger: University of Konstanz
Gabriele Spilker: University of Konstanz
Robert Steiger: University of Innsbruck

Climatic Change, 2025, vol. 178, issue 1, No 9, 24 pages

Abstract: Abstract The severity of extreme weather events is increasing due to climate change. While industrialized nations have historically contributed the most to greenhouse gas emissions and are thus considered the primary polluters, the adverse impacts of climate change are disproportionately felt in low-income countries with limited capacity to cope. These regions are generally less resilient to extreme weather, resulting in significant damage. Many vulnerable countries lack the resources to manage these losses independently, necessitating international financial support. For over 30 years, the allocation of these costs has been a central issue at UN climate conferences. At COP 27 and COP 28, an international fund was established to address climate-induced losses and damages. However, key details regarding payment obligations and the distribution of funds remain unresolved. Securing consistent funding requires public approval in donor countries. To understand public preferences, we conducted a representative choice experiment in Austria exploring various financing options for such a fund. Our findings suggest that public support is higher if contributions are based on principles of responsibility rather than voluntary donations, with a preference for disaster relief payments. Additionally, respondents favored a maximum monthly contribution of 30 € per capita and prioritized funding for slow-onset events over rapid-onset events.

Keywords: Loss and damage fund; Discrete choice experiment; Public support; Climate finance; Climate negotiations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C35 C93 H84 Q52 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-024-03843-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-024-03843-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-024-03843-x

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-024-03843-x