Climate media amidst technopolitical change: challenges, transformations, and new directions for research

Rachel Wetts (), Hanna E. Morris (), Maxwell Boykoff (), Brenda McNally (), James Painter (), Mary Sanford (), Emily P. Diamond (), Marc Esteve-del-Valle (), Loredana Loy (), Kelly E. Perry (), Urooj S. Raja () and Robin Tschötschel ()
Additional contact information
Rachel Wetts: Brown University
Hanna E. Morris: University of Toronto
Maxwell Boykoff: Cooperative Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder
Brenda McNally: University of Galway, School of English, Media and Creative Arts
James Painter: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Oxford University
Mary Sanford: CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center On Climate Change
Emily P. Diamond: University of Rhode Island
Marc Esteve-del-Valle: University of Groningen
Loredana Loy: University of Miami
Kelly E. Perry: Brown University School of Public Health
Urooj S. Raja: Loyola University Chicago
Robin Tschötschel: Hamburg University

Climatic Change, 2025, vol. 178, issue 6, No 9, 23 pages

Abstract: Abstract In this essay, we seek to provide a meta-level view of research on mediated climate change communication, taking stock of its achievements, historical and contemporary challenges, and future directions. While existing climate media scholarship has generated important insights to guide research and practice, recent empirical developments and technopolitical transformations challenge the traditional structure of climate media research. Historically, this research developed a tripartite structure where scholars have tended to focus on one of three distinct phases of the mediated communication process: (1) the production of narratives, frames, images, and other forms of communication about climate change; (2) the content and dissemination of these communication artifacts by and across media industries and institutions; and (3) these artifacts’ reception by and effects on policymakers, partisans, and publics. However, recent developments in communication technologies, media ecosystems, and the broader political landscape—including the increasing importance of social media and AI, new forms of climate obstruction, and rising antidemocratic forces across borders—have made these traditional lines of demarcation increasingly unworkable. While the lines of demarcation between production, dissemination, and reception are increasingly blurred in important new empirical phenomena, each has remained central in many scholarly works and the development of research questions. This persistence of the tripartite model, we argue, has caused climate media research to be slow to reflect the shifting dynamics of mediated climate communication today. After describing and analyzing the structural challenges that make doing more comprehensive climate media research so challenging, we conclude with proposals for new directions for scholarship that can help future research more fully contend with recent technopolitical transformations and move towards actionable research that is capable of grappling with and motivating robust responses to the complexities of climate change amid mounting authoritarian threats.

Keywords: Climate change communication; Climate change media; Digital media; Technological and political change; Transdisciplinary research; Interdisciplinary research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-03936-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03936-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-03936-1

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().