EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Robustness of Bayesian D-optimal design for the logistic mixed model against misspecification of autocorrelation

H. Abebe (), F. Tan, G. Breukelen and M. Berger

Computational Statistics, 2014, vol. 29, issue 6, 1667-1690

Abstract: In medicine and health sciences mixed effects models are often used to study time-structured data. Optimal designs for such studies have been shown useful to improve the precision of the estimators of the parameters. However, optimal designs for such studies are often derived under the assumption of a zero autocorrelation between the errors, especially for binary data. Ignoring or misspecifying the autocorrelation in the design stage can result in loss of efficiency. This paper addresses robustness of Bayesian D-optimal designs for the logistic mixed effects model for longitudinal data with a linear or quadratic time effect against incorrect specification of the autocorrelation. To find the Bayesian D-optimal allocations of time points for different values of the autocorrelation, under different priors for the fixed effects and different covariance structures of the random effects, a scalar function of the approximate variance–covariance matrix of the fixed effects is optimized. Two approximations are compared; one based on a first order penalized quasi likelihood (PQL1) and one based on an extended version of the generalized estimating equations (GEE). The results show that Bayesian D-optimal allocations of time points are robust against misspecification of the autocorrelation and are approximately equally spaced. Moreover, PQL1 and extended GEE give essentially the same Bayesian D-optimal allocation of time points for a given subject-to-measurement cost ratio. Furthermore, Bayesian optimal designs are hardly affected either by the choice of a covariance structure or by the choice of a prior distribution. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Keywords: Bayesian D-optimal designs; Logistic mixed effects model; Subject-to-measurement cost ratio; Robustness; Autocorrelation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00180-014-0512-3 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:compst:v:29:y:2014:i:6:p:1667-1690

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/statistics/journal/180/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00180-014-0512-3

Access Statistics for this article

Computational Statistics is currently edited by Wataru Sakamoto, Ricardo Cao and Jürgen Symanzik

More articles in Computational Statistics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:29:y:2014:i:6:p:1667-1690