Power comparison for propensity score methods

Byeong Yeob Choi (), Chen-Pin Wang, Joel Michalek and Jonathan Gelfond
Additional contact information
Byeong Yeob Choi: University of Texas Health Science Center
Chen-Pin Wang: University of Texas Health Science Center
Joel Michalek: University of Texas Health Science Center
Jonathan Gelfond: University of Texas Health Science Center

Computational Statistics, 2019, vol. 34, issue 2, No 15, 743-761

Abstract: Abstract We compared four propensity score (PS) methods using simulations: maximum likelihood (ML), generalized boosting models (GBM), covariate balancing propensity scores (CBPS), and generalized additive models (GAM). Although these methods have been shown to perform better than the ML in estimating causal treatment effects, no comparison has been conducted in terms of type I error and power, and the impact of treatment exposure prevalence on PS methods has not been studied. In order to fill these gaps, we considered four simulation scenarios differing by the complexity of a propensity score model and a range of exposure prevalence. Propensity score weights were estimated using the ML, CBPS and GAM of logistic regression and the GBM. We used these propensity weights to estimate the average treatment effect among treated on a binary outcome. Simulations showed that (1) the CBPS was generally superior across the four scenarios studied in terms of type I error, power and mean squared error; (2) the GBM and the GAM were less biased than the CBPS and the ML under complex models; (3) the ML performed well when treatment exposure is rare.

Keywords: Covariate balancing; Simulation; Weighting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-018-0852-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:compst:v:34:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-018-0852-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/statistics/journal/180/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00180-018-0852-5

Access Statistics for this article

Computational Statistics is currently edited by Wataru Sakamoto, Ricardo Cao and Jürgen Symanzik

More articles in Computational Statistics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().