Semi-definite programming relaxation of quadratic assignment problems based on nonredundant matrix splitting
Jiming Peng (),
Tao Zhu (),
Hezhi Luo () and
Kim-Chuan Toh ()
Computational Optimization and Applications, 2015, vol. 60, issue 1, 198 pages
Abstract:
Quadratic assignment problems (QAPs) are known to be among the most challenging discrete optimization problems. Recently, a new class of semi-definite relaxation models for QAPs based on matrix splitting has been proposed (Mittelmann and Peng, SIAM J Optim 20:3408–3426, 2010 ; Peng et al., Math Program Comput 2:59–77, 2010 ). In this paper, we consider the issue of how to choose an appropriate matrix splitting scheme so that the resulting relaxation model is easy to solve and able to provide a strong bound. For this, we first introduce a new notion of the so-called redundant and non-redundant matrix splitting and show that the relaxation based on a non-redundant matrix splitting can provide a stronger bound than a redundant one. Then we propose to follow the minimal trace principle to find a non-redundant matrix splitting via solving an auxiliary semi-definite programming problem. We show that applying the minimal trace principle directly leads to the so-called orthogonal matrix splitting introduced in (Peng et al., Math Program Comput 2:59–77, 2010 ). To find other non-redundant matrix splitting schemes whose resulting relaxation models are relatively easy to solve, we elaborate on two splitting schemes based on the so-called one-matrix and the sum-matrix. We analyze the solutions from the auxiliary problems for these two cases and characterize when they can provide a non-redundant matrix splitting. The lower bounds from these two splitting schemes are compared theoretically. Promising numerical results on some large QAP instances are reported, which further validate our theoretical conclusions. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Keywords: Quadratic assignment problem (QAP); Semi-definite programming (SDP); Semi-definite relaxation (SDR); Matrix splitting; Lower bound (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10589-014-9663-y (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:coopap:v:60:y:2015:i:1:p:171-198
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/math/journal/10589
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-014-9663-y
Access Statistics for this article
Computational Optimization and Applications is currently edited by William W. Hager
More articles in Computational Optimization and Applications from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().