EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Proximal alternating penalty algorithms for nonsmooth constrained convex optimization

Quoc Tran-Dinh ()
Additional contact information
Quoc Tran-Dinh: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-Chapel Hill)

Computational Optimization and Applications, 2019, vol. 72, issue 1, No 1, 43 pages

Abstract: Abstract We develop two new proximal alternating penalty algorithms to solve a wide range class of constrained convex optimization problems. Our approach mainly relies on a novel combination of the classical quadratic penalty, alternating minimization, Nesterov’s acceleration, adaptive strategy for parameters. The first algorithm is designed to solve generic and possibly nonsmooth constrained convex problems without requiring any Lipschitz gradient continuity or strong convexity, while achieving the best-known $$\mathcal {O}\left( \frac{1}{k}\right) $$ O 1 k -convergence rate in a non-ergodic sense, where k is the iteration counter. The second algorithm is also designed to solve non-strongly convex, but semi-strongly convex problems. This algorithm can achieve the best-known $$\mathcal {O}\left( \frac{1}{k^2}\right) $$ O 1 k 2 -convergence rate on the primal constrained problem. Such a rate is obtained in two cases: (1) averaging only on the iterate sequence of the strongly convex term, or (2) using two proximal operators of this term without averaging. In both algorithms, we allow one to linearize the second subproblem to use the proximal operator of the corresponding objective term. Then, we customize our methods to solve different convex problems, and lead to new variants. As a byproduct, these algorithms preserve the same convergence guarantees as in our main algorithms. We verify our theoretical development via different numerical examples and compare our methods with some existing state-of-the-art algorithms.

Keywords: Proximal alternating algorithm; Quadratic penalty method; Accelerated scheme; Constrained convex optimization; First-order methods; Convergence rate; 90C25; 90-08 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-018-0033-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:coopap:v:72:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10589-018-0033-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/math/journal/10589

DOI: 10.1007/s10589-018-0033-z

Access Statistics for this article

Computational Optimization and Applications is currently edited by William W. Hager

More articles in Computational Optimization and Applications from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:72:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10589-018-0033-z