EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An efficient adaptive accelerated inexact proximal point method for solving linearly constrained nonconvex composite problems

Weiwei Kong (), Jefferson G. Melo () and Renato D. C. Monteiro ()
Additional contact information
Weiwei Kong: Georgia Institute of Technology
Jefferson G. Melo: Federal University of Goias
Renato D. C. Monteiro: Georgia Institute of Technology

Computational Optimization and Applications, 2020, vol. 76, issue 2, No 2, 305-346

Abstract: Abstract This paper proposes an efficient adaptive variant of a quadratic penalty accelerated inexact proximal point (QP-AIPP) method proposed earlier by the authors. Both the QP-AIPP method and its variant solve linearly set constrained nonconvex composite optimization problems using a quadratic penalty approach where the generated penalized subproblems are solved by a variant of the underlying AIPP method. The variant, in turn, solves a given penalized subproblem by generating a sequence of proximal subproblems which are then solved by an accelerated composite gradient algorithm. The main difference between AIPP and its variant is that the proximal subproblems in the former are always convex while the ones in the latter are not necessarily convex due to the fact that their prox parameters are chosen as aggressively as possible so as to improve efficiency. The possibly nonconvex proximal subproblems generated by the AIPP variant are also tentatively solved by a novel adaptive accelerated composite gradient algorithm based on the validity of some key convergence inequalities. As a result, the variant generates a sequence of proximal subproblems where the stepsizes are adaptively changed according to the responses obtained from the calls to the accelerated composite gradient algorithm. Finally, numerical results are given to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed AIPP and QP-AIPP variants.

Keywords: Quadratic penalty method; Nonconvex program; Iteration-complexity; Proximal point method; First-order accelerated methods; 47J22; 90C26; 90C30; 90C60; 65K10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-020-00188-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:coopap:v:76:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10589-020-00188-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/math/journal/10589

DOI: 10.1007/s10589-020-00188-w

Access Statistics for this article

Computational Optimization and Applications is currently edited by William W. Hager

More articles in Computational Optimization and Applications from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:76:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10589-020-00188-w