The social costs of gun ownership revisited
Florian Neumeier () and
Christian Westphal ()
Empirical Economics, 2019, vol. 56, issue 1, 1-12
Abstract Cook and Ludwig (J Public Econ 90:379–391, 2006) use data on homicide rates and gun prevalence proxies from US counties over the period 1980–1999 and, in their panel data analysis, find a positive and statistically significant association between both variables. We reexamine their analysis and show that their findings are driven by spurious correlations arising from the use of a common denominator (ratio fallacy) to deflate both dependent and independent variables. When we attempt to replicate their results accounting for these issues, we no longer find any evidence that gun ownership is linked to homicides.
Keywords: Gun ownership; Social costs; Ratio fallacy; Spurious correlation; Log ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H21 I18 K42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-018-1496-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:56:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s00181-018-1496-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Badi H. Baltagi, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Michael Lechner
More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().