Costly state verification and truthtelling: a note on the theory of debt contracts

Josef Schosser () and Jochen Wilhelm
Additional contact information
Josef Schosser: University of Passau
Jochen Wilhelm: University of Passau

Economic Theory Bulletin, 2018, vol. 6, issue 2, No 1, 129-139

Abstract: Abstract When firms want to raise external financing, why do they resort to contracts with fixed repayment, i.e., standard debt contracts? The canonical work of Gale and Hellwig (Rev Econ Stud, 52(4):647–663, 1985) gives the following answer to this question: Assuming that only the entrepreneur can observe the project’s outcome free of charge, the standard debt contract proves to be an incentive-compatible financing design. However, this approach remains inadequate, as neither the lender nor the borrower is given the possibility to act strategically. The paper at hand takes up this aspect. By means of a simple game-theoretic model and focusing on a binary outcome setting, it is shown that every risky standard debt contract is dominated by at least one ownership contract. In this respect, costly state verification cannot act as a raison d’être of contracts with fixed repayment.

Keywords: Costly state verification; Financing contracts; Incentive compatibility; Perfect Bayesian Nash equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D82 D86 G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40505-018-0137-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:etbull:v:6:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40505-018-0137-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40505

DOI: 10.1007/s40505-018-0137-8

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Theory Bulletin is currently edited by Nicholas C. Yannelis

More articles in Economic Theory Bulletin from Springer, Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().