Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: The Differential Effect of GSS Restrictiveness on Process Satisfaction and Group Cohesion

Wm. David Salisbury (), Michael Parent () and Wynne W. Chin ()
Additional contact information
Wm. David Salisbury: University of Dayton
Michael Parent: Simon Fraser University
Wynne W. Chin: The University of Houston

Group Decision and Negotiation, 2008, vol. 17, issue 4, No 3, 303-320

Abstract: Abstract That Group Support Systems (GSS) can enhance group performance has been revealed by several studies. Studies have also demonstrated a favorable influence on process satisfaction. However, GSS research has drawn heavily from a perspective that may limit the full range of phenomena at play in group meetings. In addition to the micro-level interaction that occurs in GSS-supported group meetings, group participants are also likely influenced by other groups and macro-level institutions outside any given small group meeting. We focus on two processes in particular. Group performance perceptions such as process satisfaction appear to be driven by reproduction of institutionally relevant procedures while group interaction perceptions such as cohesion are driven by micro-level group interaction. This study more fully considers the impact on group interaction variables by varying levels of GSS restrictiveness (i.e., facilitation and process structuring) and assessing the effect that these may have on perceptions of group cohesion and process satisfaction. We develop and test a causal path model, finding that groups in the more restrictive treatment perceived that they made more appropriate use of the GSS, leading to higher process satisfaction than did those in the less restrictive treatment. However, these groups are also characterized by reduced group interaction, and also expressed lower perceived cohesion than did those in the non-restrictive treatment. Theoretical discussions of why this may have occurred are offered.

Keywords: Group Support Systems; Perceived cohesion; Process satisfaction; Facilitation; Restrictiveness; Hidden Profile Task; Path analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-007-9096-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:17:y:2008:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-007-9096-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10726-007-9096-4

Access Statistics for this article

Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten

More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().