A Model of Bargaining over Hazardous Waste Cleanup
D. Marc Kilgour () and
Jason K. Levy
Additional contact information
D. Marc Kilgour: Wilfrid Laurier University
Jason K. Levy: Virginia Commonwealth University
Group Decision and Negotiation, 2009, vol. 18, issue 4, No 4, 335-347
Abstract:
Abstract We put forward a formal model of a bargaining problem in which two parties suspected of contaminating the environment are responsible for clean-up costs. If the parties do not negotiate an agreement on a cost allocation, one will be imposed by the government. This process is commonly used in environmental cleanups performed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). Passed by the US Congress in 1980 and administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), CERCLA provides the U.S. government with authority to manage releases (or threatened releases) of hazardous substances that may endanger public health or the environment. We conclude that potentially responsible parties will be induced to settle only in the face of specific allocations of clean-up and explicit threats. For example, at the Middlefield–Ellis–Whisman Superfund site in Mountain View, California, the responsibilities of the different parties for soil and groundwater contamination are understood by all, yet our negotiation model predicts that without the threat that additional costs will be imposed, agreement on the allocation of clean up costs will never be reached.
Keywords: Negotiation; Toxic waste; Bargaining; Pollution; Hazardous material (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-008-9143-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:18:y:2009:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-008-9143-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-008-9143-9
Access Statistics for this article
Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten
More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().