Type-2 TOPSIS: A Group Decision Problem When Ideal Values are not Extreme Endpoints
Majid Zerafat Angiz Langroudi,
Ali Emrouznejad,
Adli Mustafa and
Joshua Ignatius ()
Additional contact information
Majid Zerafat Angiz Langroudi: Universiti Sains Malaysia
Ali Emrouznejad: Aston University
Adli Mustafa: Universiti Sains Malaysia
Joshua Ignatius: Universiti Sains Malaysia
Group Decision and Negotiation, 2013, vol. 22, issue 5, No 2, 866 pages
Abstract:
Abstract In the traditional TOPSIS, the ideal solutions are assumed to be located at the endpoints of the data interval. However, not all performance attributes possess ideal values at the endpoints. We termed performance attributes that have ideal values at extreme points as Type-1 attributes. Type-2 attributes however possess ideal values somewhere within the data interval instead of being at the extreme end points. This provides a preference ranking problem when all attributes are computed and assumed to be of the Type-1 nature. To overcome this issue, we propose a new Fuzzy DEA method for computing the ideal values and distance function of Type-2 attributes in a TOPSIS methodology. Our method allows Type-1 and Type-2 attributes to be included in an evaluation system without compromising the ranking quality. The efficacy of the proposed model is illustrated with a vendor evaluation case for a high-tech investment decision making exercise. A comparison analysis with the traditional TOPSIS is also presented.
Keywords: Multiple attribute decision making (MADM); Fuzzy data envelopment analysis; TOPSIS; MCDM; Group decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-012-9296-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:22:y:2013:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9296-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-012-9296-4
Access Statistics for this article
Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten
More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().