Multi-criteria Remote Asynchronous Group Decision Screening: An Experimental Study
Roman V. Efremov () and
Alexander V. Lotov
Additional contact information
Roman V. Efremov: Rey Juan Carlos University
Alexander V. Lotov: Dorodnicyn Computing Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Group Decision and Negotiation, 2014, vol. 23, issue 1, No 3, 48 pages
Abstract:
Abstract A new visualization-based multi-criteria procedure for group decision screening is presented. The procedure supports a group in selecting a small number of alternatives from an initial list described by a collection of attributes which are used as screening criteria. We propose and experimentally study the Group Remote Asynchronous Screening Support (GRASS) procedure that can be used by a large number of participants who are not able to meet face to face. GRASS does not use any interaction between the participants and the group screening is based on the individual preferences expressed by them independently from each other. GRASS uses the concepts of Borda count, by applying the visualization of information to simplify the analysis of large lists of multi-criteria alternatives. Visualization is used to support the individual analysis of the variety of alternatives and the individual selecting of a small number of alternatives from the list for the subsequent scoring through Borda count. Visualization is carried via the Interactive Decision Maps / Reasonable Goals Method (IDM/RGM) technique. We first check a speculative supposition that participants are able to find a single best alternative by using the GRASS procedure. As it is not the case, we re-formulate our hypothesis and check whether the most preferred alternative is part of a short list of alternatives returned through GRASS. The experiment was carried out with senior applied mathematics students who managed to apply GRASS without any problem.
Keywords: Participatory decision making; Asynchronous distributed decision making; Interactive decision maps; Reasonable Goals Method; Borda count (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-012-9327-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:23:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9327-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-012-9327-1
Access Statistics for this article
Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten
More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().