An Application of Focus Theory to Project Management Processes
Fang Chen (),
Jay F. Nunamaker (),
Robert O. Briggs (),
Gail Corbitt (),
James Sager () and
Stanley C. Gardiner ()
Additional contact information
Fang Chen: University of Manitoba
Jay F. Nunamaker: The University of Arizona
Robert O. Briggs: San Diego State University
Gail Corbitt: SAP University Alliance
James Sager: California State University at Chico
Stanley C. Gardiner: California State University at Chico
Group Decision and Negotiation, 2014, vol. 23, issue 5, No 2, 978 pages
Abstract:
Abstract This article presents the findings of an exploratory study of the degree to which Focus Theory, a general theory about group productivity, can be used to improve the productivity of project management activities. Guided by the theory and the principles of collaboration engineering, we developed a collaborative template for project progress status reporting. We evaluated the template in both face-to-face and distributed group interactions. The study indicated that a collaborative template helped structure status reporting activity and provided a permanent record of project status for future reference. As a result, it was efficient and effective for team leaders to prepare topics for project status meetings by using the template. The meetings became focused on topics outlined on the template and meeting participants commented that the meeting record helped them keep track of what had been either accomplished or decided. The major limitation observed for use of the template was that, when used in distributed and synchronous interactions, it needed to be augmented by voice communication because communication in text-only format, as provided by the template, was too time-consuming. We discuss implications of the research outcomes with respect to the usefulness and limitations of Focus Theory.
Keywords: Focus Theory; Virtual team; Virtual project; Group Support Systems; Project management; Project process management; Project progress tracking; Collaboration engineering (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-012-9323-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:23:y:2014:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9323-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-012-9323-5
Access Statistics for this article
Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten
More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().