A Bayesian Approach to Maximising Inner Compatibility in AHP-Systemic Decision Making
Manuel Salvador,
Alfredo Altuzarra,
Pilar Gargallo and
José María Moreno-Jiménez ()
Additional contact information
Manuel Salvador: Universidad de Zaragoza
Alfredo Altuzarra: Universidad de Zaragoza
Pilar Gargallo: Universidad de Zaragoza
José María Moreno-Jiménez: Universidad de Zaragoza
Group Decision and Negotiation, 2015, vol. 24, issue 4, No 7, 655-673
Abstract:
Abstract The challenges of the knowledge society and the development of the information and communication technologies favour the participation of multiple, spatially distributed actors in decision making processes. In this context, Systemic Decision Making (Moreno-Jiménez et al. in Systemic decision making in AHP: a Bayesian approach, 2014) provides a new approach to dealing with complex multi-actor decision making problems in which individual preferences in a fixed set of alternatives are viewed from a holistic standpoint under the “principle of tolerance”. Moreno-Jiménez et al. (Systemic decision making in AHP: a Bayesian approach, 2014) base the integration of preferences on the tolerance distribution, which can be used to reach a holistic, joint decision solution in a Bayesian AHP-Systemic Decision Making context. As with any aggregation procedure or synthesis measure, however, some of the actors involved in the resolution process may not be in agreement with the joint solution. In this paper, we propose a measure (which we call the compatibility index) to evaluate the level of tolerance of the actors involved in the decision making process with regard to the resulting tolerance distribution (inner compatibility). We also develop two algorithms to improve the level of tolerance. The methodology is illustrated with a case study based on a simplified version of a real e-cognocracy application (Moreno-Jiménez and Polasek in J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 12:163–176, 2003) carried out in cooperation with the City Council of Zaragoza.
Keywords: Multicriteria; AHP; Systemic decision making; Inner compatibility; Bayesian inference; Tolerance distribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-014-9407-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9407-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-014-9407-5
Access Statistics for this article
Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten
More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().