Implementing a Multiple Criteria Model to Debate About Nuclear Power Plants Safety Choices

F. Beaudouin ()
Additional contact information
F. Beaudouin: EDF R&D

Group Decision and Negotiation, 2015, vol. 24, issue 6, No 6, 1035-1063

Abstract: Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present a model that supports debate about nuclear safety measurement within the operator’ organization. This model concentrates on cognitive aspects specific to debate. For that purpose, it describes the construction of a multiattribute function that aims to give experts’ judgments about six safety criteria. These criteria cover the safety performances of power plant design modifications. An extension of this model based on Choquet’s integral is then given in order to improve the descriptive performance of the multiple criteria model. Lastly, we investigate its implementation in the context of group decision.

Keywords: Choquet’s integral; Multiattribute utility theory; Facilitation; Negotiation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-015-9428-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-015-9428-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10726-015-9428-8

Access Statistics for this article

Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten

More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().