EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Novel Conflict Resolution Model with The Composition of Probabilistic Preferences Methodology–CRMCPP

Annibal P. Sant’anna (), Ana Paula C. S. Costa () and Maisa M. Silva ()
Additional contact information
Annibal P. Sant’anna: Escola de Engenharia, Universidade Federal Fluminense–UFF
Ana Paula C. S. Costa: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco–UFPE
Maisa M. Silva: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco–UFPE

Group Decision and Negotiation, 2022, vol. 31, issue 2, No 5, 363-385

Abstract: Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose a four-stage conflict resolution model. In the first stage, a multicriteria model is developed for each of the conflicting parties, taken as decision makers (DMs) facing evaluations of a set of alternatives according to proper criteria. In the second stage, the composition of probabilistic preferences (CPP) methodology is applied to identify the best alternative for each of the conflicting parties. In the third stage, negotiation is carried out to remove alternatives and to focus on the subset of best alternatives for the group of DMs. The fourth stage consists of applying CPP again to choose one among the remaining alternatives. The model is illustrated by means of applying it to two different conflicts. The main features of the model are that it allows the DMs (i) to understand differences and proximities between the positions of each of them, (ii) to strategically reduce the initial set of alternatives, (iii) to advance in their positions towards a common goal, and (iv) to construct a unique final solution quickly.

Keywords: Composition of probabilistic preferences (CPP); Conflict resolution model; Negotiation; Multicriteria model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-021-09771-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:31:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-021-09771-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10726-021-09771-w

Access Statistics for this article

Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten

More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:31:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-021-09771-w