The Condorcet's Jury Theorem in a Bioethical Context: The Dynamics of Group Decision Making

Tom Koch and Mark Ridgley
Additional contact information
Tom Koch: University of British Columbia
Mark Ridgley: University of Hawaii (Manoa)

Group Decision and Negotiation, 2000, vol. 9, issue 5, No 2, 379-392

Abstract: Abstract The Condorcet Jury Theorem was the first and remains a central model of collective decision making in both social and political theory. Advanced as an argument for small group or “jury” decision processes over those of individual experts, its axioms and conclusions have been a subject of rigorous debate in recent years. Those considerations have typically been mathematical and theoretical, however, rather than concrete and descriptive. This paper considers the applicability of the Jury Theorem in light of data collected in a series of focus groups organized at The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Canada) to review organ transplant eligibility criteria. With each of four focus groups we used the Analytic Hierarchy Process to elicit views of hospital members and users on the relative importance of criteria commonly used to define organ transplant eligibility. Analysis of the priority measures obtained provided clear insights into issues of consensus, the role of experts, and the process of collective decision making by heterogeneous juries. The conclusions may be of use to those interested in democratic process and social theory in all contexts - legal, moral, and political - involving small group decision making.

Keywords: analytic hierarchy process; bioethics; condorcet jury theorem; multicriterion decision making; organ transplantation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1008712331820 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:9:y:2000:i:5:d:10.1023_a:1008712331820

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2

DOI: 10.1023/A:1008712331820

Access Statistics for this article

Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten

More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().