Economics at your fingertips  

Custom-made health-care: an experimental investigation

Claudia Keser (), Claude Montmarquette, Martin Schmidt and Cornelius Schnitzler
Additional contact information
Claudia Keser: Universität Göttingen
Martin Schmidt: Universität Göttingen
Cornelius Schnitzler: Universität Göttingen

Health Economics Review, 2020, vol. 10, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract Background Physicians’ financial interests might conflict with the best service to patients. It is essential to gain a thorough understanding of the effect of remuneration systems on physician behaviour. Methods We conducted a controlled laboratory experiment using a within-subject design to investigate physician behaviour underpayment heterogeneity. Each physician provided medical care to patients whose treatments were paid for under fee-for-service (FFS) or capitation (CAP). Results We observed that physicians customized their care in response to the payment system. FFS patients received considerably more medical care than did CAP patients with the same illness and treatment preference. Physicians over-served FFS patients and under-served CAP patients. After a CAP payment reduction, we observed neither a quantity reduction under CAP nor a spillover in FFS patients’ treatment. Conclusions The results suggest that, in our experimental model, fee regulation can be used to some extent to control physician spending since we did not identify a behavioural response to the CAP payment cut. Physicians did not recoup lost income by altering treatment behaviour toward CAP and/or FFS patients. Experimental economics is an excellent tool for ensuring the welfare of all those involved in the health system. Further research should investigate payment incentives as a means of developing health care teams that are more efficient.

Keywords: Experimental economics; Physician reimbursement; Capitation; Fee-for-service; Fee regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Custom-made healthcare: An experimental investigation (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Custom-made healthcare – An experimental investigation (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1186/s13561-020-00299-4

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics Review is currently edited by J. Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg

More articles in Health Economics Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

Page updated 2021-10-05
Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:10:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-020-00299-4