Field-of-study mismatch and overqualification: labour market correlates and their wage penalty
Guillermo Montt ()
Additional contact information
Guillermo Montt: International Labour Office
IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 2017, vol. 6, issue 1, 1-20
Abstract Field-of-study mismatch occurs when a worker, trained in a particular field, works in another field. This study draws on the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) to explore how skill supply and labour market demand dynamics influence mismatch. It updates cross-national estimates on mismatch and estimates the mismatch wage penalty. Findings suggest that around 40% of workers are mismatched by field at their qualification level, 11% overqualified in their field and 13% overqualified and working outside their field. The saturation of the field in the labour market and the transferability of the fields’ skills predict the incidence of field-of-study mismatch and overqualification. Workers who are mismatched by field only suffer a wage penalty if they are overqualified.
JEL-codes: J24 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40172-016-0052-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:izalbr:v:6:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s40172-016-0052-x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
IZA Journal of Labor Economics is currently edited by Joni Hersch and Pierre Cahuc
More articles in IZA Journal of Labor Economics from Springer, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().