EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Test of Positive Association for Detecting Heterogeneity in Capture for Capture–Recapture Data

Anita Jeyam (), Rachel S. McCrea, Thomas Bregnballe, Morten Frederiksen and Roger Pradel
Additional contact information
Anita Jeyam: University of Kent
Rachel S. McCrea: University of Kent
Thomas Bregnballe: Aarhus University
Morten Frederiksen: Aarhus University
Roger Pradel: Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive UMR 5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2018, vol. 23, issue 1, No 1, 19 pages

Abstract: Abstract The Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) model assumes that all marked animals have equal recapture probabilities at each sampling occasion, but heterogeneity in capture often occurs and should be taken into account to avoid biases in parameter estimates. Although diagnostic tests are generally used to detect trap-dependence or transience and assess the overall fit of the model, heterogeneity in capture is not routinely tested for. In order to detect and identify this phenomenon in a CJS framework, we propose a test of positive association between previous and future encounters using Goodman–Kruskal’s gamma. This test is based solely on the raw capture histories and makes no assumption on model structure. The development of the test is motivated by a dataset of Sandwich terns (Thalasseus sandvicensis), and we use the test to formally show that they exhibit heterogeneity in capture. We use simulation to assess the performance of the test in the detection of heterogeneity in capture, compared to existing and corrected diagnostic goodness-of-fit tests, Leslie’s test of equal catchability and Carothers’ extension of the Leslie test. The test of positive association is easy to use and produces good results, demonstrating high power to detect heterogeneity in capture. We recommend using this new test prior to model fitting as the outcome will guide the model-building process and help draw more accurate biological conclusions. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Keywords: Cormack–Jolly–Seber model; Goodman–Kruskal’s gamma; Goodness-of-fit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-017-0315-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-017-0315-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/13253

DOI: 10.1007/s13253-017-0315-4

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics is currently edited by Stephen Buckland

More articles in Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics from Springer, The International Biometric Society, American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-017-0315-4