The Third Competition on Spatial Statistics for Large Datasets

Yiping Hong, Yan Song, Sameh Abdulah, Ying Sun, Hatem Ltaief, David E. Keyes and Marc G. Genton ()
Additional contact information
Yiping Hong: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Yan Song: Beijing Institute of Technology
Sameh Abdulah: Beijing Institute of Technology
Ying Sun: Beijing Institute of Technology
Hatem Ltaief: Beijing Institute of Technology
David E. Keyes: Beijing Institute of Technology
Marc G. Genton: Beijing Institute of Technology

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2023, vol. 28, issue 4, No 4, 618-635

Abstract: Abstract Given the computational challenges involved in calculating the maximum likelihood estimates for large spatial datasets, there has been significant interest in the research community regarding approximation methods for estimation and subsequent predictions. However, prior studies examining the evaluation of these methods have primarily focused on scenarios where the data are observed on a regular grid or originate from a uniform distribution of locations. Nevertheless, non-uniformly distributed locations are commonplace in fields like meteorology and ecology. Examples include gridded data with missing observations acquired through remote sensing techniques. To assess the reliability and effectiveness of cutting-edge approximation methods, we have initiated a competition focused on estimation and prediction for large spatial datasets with non-uniformly distributed locations. Participants were invited to employ their preferred methods to generate corresponding confidence and prediction intervals for synthetic datasets of varying sizes and spatial configurations. This competition serves as a valuable opportunity to benchmark and compare different approaches in a controlled setting. We evaluated the submissions from 11 different research teams worldwide. In summary, the Vecchia approximation and the fractional SPDE methods were among the best performers for estimation and prediction. Furthermore, the nearest neighbors Gaussian process and the multi-resolution approximation exhibited excellent performance in predictive tasks. These findings provide valuable guidance for selecting the most appropriate approximation methods based on specific data characteristics. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Keywords: Confidence interval; Matérn covariance model; Non-uniform distributed locations; Prediction interval; Scoring rule; Spatial statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-023-00584-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:28:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-023-00584-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/13253

DOI: 10.1007/s13253-023-00584-9

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics is currently edited by Stephen Buckland

More articles in Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics from Springer, The International Biometric Society, American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().