Estimating the Causal Effect of Glyphosate Aspersion on Coca Cultivation in Colombia

Perla Irasema Rivadeneyra García (), Luisa Scaccia and Luca Salvati
Additional contact information
Perla Irasema Rivadeneyra García: University Ca’ Foscari of Venice
Luisa Scaccia: University of Macerata
Luca Salvati: University of Rome Sapienza

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2025, vol. 30, issue 2, No 8, 385-404

Abstract: Abstract Deforestation and unsustainable practices are posing a severe threat to the invaluable natural treasure represented by the Amazon rain forest. Among other anthropogenic factors, illegal activities driven by organized crime, such as illegal logging, poaching, land grabbing, and coca cultivation significantly impact deforestation. In Colombia, aerial fumigation with glyphosate was a key policy for curbing coca cultivation from 1994 until 2015. This measure was eventually banned after years of opposition and debates over its effectiveness, coupled with concerns about its adverse impacts on local communities and the environment. Many studies, environmental groups, and individual legal complaints argue that health issues and environmental degradation are direct consequences of glyphosate use, although there is no universal agreement about the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate in humans among international institutions, and its environmental impact is also debated. Discussions about reinstating the use of glyphosate are still ongoing, driven in part by advocacy from the United States and certain political factions, despite significant opposition from environmental groups, local communities, and human rights organizations. In this context, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of using fumigation with glyphosate to reduce the spread of coca plantations. We use a 15-year panel (2000-2015) of Colombian municipalities, including two-way fixed effects. To address endogeneity issues, we instrument aspersion with the number of days in which wind strength was below a certain threshold and aerial fumigation could take place. Estimates suggest that, contrary to its intended purpose, fumigation may actually lead to an increase in coca crop extension in most model specifications.

Keywords: Deforestation; Panel regression; Instrumental variables; Colombia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-024-00660-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:30:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-024-00660-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/13253

DOI: 10.1007/s13253-024-00660-8

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics is currently edited by Stephen Buckland

More articles in Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics from Springer, The International Biometric Society, American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().