Redundant configuration of automated flow lines based on “Industry 4.0”-technologies

Christoph Müller (), Martin Grunewald and Thomas S. Spengler
Additional contact information
Christoph Müller: Technische Universität Braunschweig
Martin Grunewald: Technische Universität Braunschweig
Thomas S. Spengler: Technische Universität Braunschweig

Journal of Business Economics, 2017, vol. 87, issue 7, No 1, 877-898

Abstract: Abstract Over the past decades, robots have been heavily used for flow lines to increase productivity and product quality and to relieve workers of repetitive and dangerous tasks. However, despite continuous improvement of robots, the occurrence of failures remains a significant challenge in the operation of automated flow lines. Due to the connection of the stations in a flow line via a material handling system, failures at one station can quickly lead to throughput losses due to blocking and starving of upstream and downstream stations, respectively. To some extent, these throughput losses can be reduced by installing buffers between the stations. However, the installation of buffers requires considerable investments and scarce factory space. Therefore, the minimization of the total number of buffers is one of the primary objectives in flow line planning. Due to the advances of manufacturing technologies that form the foundation of “Industry 4.0”, new solutions to reduce throughput losses caused by equipment failures open up. One solution is a redundant configuration, in which downstream stations automatically take over the operations of failed stations in the event of failure. The throughput loss in these situations mainly depends on the level of redundancy designed into the system. Based on existing methods for the design of automated flow lines, we present two line balancing formulations for the configuration of automated flow lines under consideration of redundancies. The first formulation aims at maximizing the lines’ level of redundancy. The second formulation aims at a balanced allocation of redundancies along the line. To evaluate the presented formulations, we compare the performance with an existing line balancing approach for automated lines. With respect to this approach, improvements of the throughput rate between 3 % and 7 % are achieved.

Keywords: Industry 4.0; Flow line; Line balancing; Line configuration; Redundancy; Robotics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L60 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11573-016-0831-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:87:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1007_s11573-016-0831-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11573

DOI: 10.1007/s11573-016-0831-7

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Economics is currently edited by Günter Fandel

More articles in Journal of Business Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().