Likeability in subjective performance evaluations: does it bias managers’ weighting of performance measures?

Kai A. Bauch (), Peter Kotzian and Barbara E. Weißenberger
Additional contact information
Kai A. Bauch: University of Bern
Peter Kotzian: Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf
Barbara E. Weißenberger: Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf

Journal of Business Economics, 2021, vol. 91, issue 1, No 3, 35-59

Abstract: Abstract In this paper, we investigate how subordinate likeability induces bias in managers’ subjective performance evaluations. Based on the affect-consistency heuristic, we expect managers who use multiple performance measures to subjectively evaluate their subordinates’ performance to place greater weight on likeability-consistent performance measures than on likeability-inconsistent measures. Hence, we predict that likeability and performance information interact in affecting managers’ performance evaluations. The results of our experiment support this prediction. In line with prior research, we find evidence of likeability bias in subjective performance evaluations: likeable subordinates receive more favorable evaluations than dislikeable ones. We further find that participants adjust their performance evaluations in the presence of likeability-consistent performance information to a greater extent than in the presence of likeability-inconsistent performance information. Thus, in accordance with the affect-consistency heuristic, our results indicate that likeability bias occurs due to a differential, biased weighting of performance measures. Additionally, we find that perceived likeability is also affected by subordinates’ performance, which in turn partially mediates the effect of subordinate performance on evaluations: good performers are more likeable than poor performers. Hence, this can exacerbate likeability bias. We discuss the implications of our findings for the design of performance evaluation systems in practice.

Keywords: Likeability bias; Affect; Subjective performance evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M12 M41 M52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11573-020-00976-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:91:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11573-020-00976-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11573

DOI: 10.1007/s11573-020-00976-0

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Economics is currently edited by Günter Fandel

More articles in Journal of Business Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().