The dynamics of IP contract patterns in the German biotechnology industry – a mixed-methods approach

Steffen Grebe () and Svenja Jarchow ()
Additional contact information
Steffen Grebe: Technical University of Munich
Svenja Jarchow: Technical University of Munich

Journal of Business Economics, 2025, vol. 95, issue 1, No 4, 75-102

Abstract: Abstract Academic spin-offs play a pivotal role in leveraging the economic potential of scientific discoveries by transferring research results into marketable technologies, products, and services. The creation of a spin-off is frequently formalized through an intellectual property (IP) contract between the research institution and the new venture, which establishes the foundation for the spin-off’s initial growth. While the broad impact of research institutions on IP contract patterns is acknowledged, further investigation is required to ascertain the specific effects of their individual preferences. Furthermore, country-specific characteristics influence technology transfer practices. However, the lack of empirical data on IP contract patterns in research-intensive nations, such as Germany, impedes a comprehensive analysis. This study examines the impact of the individual risk and reward assessments of German public research institutions on the design of IP contract patterns. A sequential mixed-methods approach is employed, starting with a survey of biotechnology spin-offs to collect empirical data on IP contract patterns. This is complemented by semi-structured expert interviews with technology transfer managers to triangulate the survey data and gain insights from the perspective of the research institutions. Our findings suggest that the observed heterogeneity in IP contract patterns can be attributed to the varying risk and reward assessments of research institutions. The resource-based view allows us to demonstrate that these variations arise from institutional preferences regarding the transfer of IP ownership versus licensing IP to spin-offs and accepting spin-off equity and/or cash compensation. The resource-based considerations in question vary between universities and non-university research institutions and are shaped by the individual IP strategies and resource endowments of each.

Keywords: Technology transfer; Spin-offs; Intellectual property; Contract patterns; Fundraising; Risk assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11573-024-01217-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:95:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11573-024-01217-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11573

DOI: 10.1007/s11573-024-01217-4

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Economics is currently edited by Günter Fandel

More articles in Journal of Business Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().