EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing Boosting and Bagging for Decision Trees of Rankings

Antonella Plaia (), Simona Buscemi (), Johannes Fürnkranz () and Eneldo Loza Mencía ()
Additional contact information
Antonella Plaia: University of Palermo
Simona Buscemi: University of Palermo
Johannes Fürnkranz: Johannes Kepler University Linz
Eneldo Loza Mencía: Technische Universität Darmstadt

Journal of Classification, 2022, vol. 39, issue 1, No 6, 78-99

Abstract: Abstract Decision tree learning is among the most popular and most traditional families of machine learning algorithms. While these techniques excel in being quite intuitive and interpretable, they also suffer from instability: small perturbations in the training data may result in big changes in the predictions. The so-called ensemble methods combine the output of multiple trees, which makes the decision more reliable and stable. They have been primarily applied to numeric prediction problems and to classification tasks. In the last years, some attempts to extend the ensemble methods to ordinal data can be found in the literature, but no concrete methodology has been provided for preference data. In this paper, we extend decision trees, and in the following also ensemble methods to ranking data. In particular, we propose a theoretical and computational definition of bagging and boosting, two of the best known ensemble methods. In an experimental study using simulated data and real-world datasets, our results confirm that known results from classification, such as that boosting outperforms bagging, could be successfully carried over to the ranking case.

Keywords: Boosting; Rankings; Ensemble methods; Preference learning; Decision trees (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00357-021-09397-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jclass:v:39:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s00357-021-09397-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... hods/journal/357/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00357-021-09397-2

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Classification is currently edited by Douglas Steinley

More articles in Journal of Classification from Springer, The Classification Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:39:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s00357-021-09397-2