Does the absence of human sellers bias bidding behavior in auction experiments?
Björn Bartling,
Tobias Gesche and
Nick Netzer
Journal of the Economic Science Association, 2017, vol. 3, issue 1, No 4, 44-61
Abstract:
Abstract This paper studies the impact of human subjects in the role of a seller on bidding in experimental second-price auctions. Overbidding is a robust finding in second-price auctions, and spite among bidders has been advanced as an explanation. If spite extends to the seller, then the absence of human sellers who receive the auction revenue may bias upwards the bidding behavior in existing experimental auctions. We derive the equilibrium bidding function in a model where bidders have preferences regarding both the payoffs of other bidders and the seller’s revenue. Overbidding is optimal when buyers are spiteful only towards other buyers. However, optimal bids are lower and potentially even truthful when spite extends to the seller. We experimentally test the model predictions by exogenously varying the presence of human subjects in the roles of the seller and competing bidders. We do not detect a systematic effect of the presence of a human seller on overbidding. We conclude that overbidding is not an artefact of the standard experimental implementation of second-price auctions in which human sellers are absent.
Keywords: Second-price auction; Spite; Overbidding; Lab experiments; External validity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D03 D44 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40881-017-0037-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:3:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s40881-017-0037-y
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/40881
DOI: 10.1007/s40881-017-0037-y
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Economic Science Association is currently edited by Nikos Nikiforakis and Robert Slonim
More articles in Journal of the Economic Science Association from Springer, Economic Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().