EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Debates and assumptions about motion picture performance: a meta-analysis

François A. Carrillat (), Renaud Legoux () and Allègre L. Hadida ()
Additional contact information
François A. Carrillat: University of Technology Sydney, Business School
Renaud Legoux: HEC Montréal
Allègre L. Hadida: University of Cambridge

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2018, vol. 46, issue 2, No 7, 273-299

Abstract: Abstract Across the many studies of motion picture box office success, unresolved debates and untested assumptions about the contributing factors persist. Using an accessibility–diagnosticity framework and a meta-analysis of 634 effect sizes from 150 studies, the current article seeks to clarify the relationships of star brand equity and product reviews (from consumers and critics) with box office success. The popularity of stars (market and media appeals) exerts a stronger impact on box office success than their artistic recognition (as per award nominations and wins) at the moment of a movie’s release but not over its extended theatrical run. Whereas the impact of popular stars on box office success decreases over time, the influence of artistically recognized stars remains steady. The findings also identify a dual role for critics, who influence consumers’ movie choice and predict box office performance by merely reflecting moviegoers’ tastes. Finally, this study refutes the assumption that the impact of users’ reviews strengthens over time, relative to critics’ reviews.

Keywords: Cinema; Meta-analysis; Star brand equity; Product reviews; Critics’ reviews; Users’ reviews; Cue diagnosticity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-017-0561-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:46:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11747-017-0561-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... gement/journal/11747

DOI: 10.1007/s11747-017-0561-6

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science is currently edited by John Hulland, Anne Hoekman and Mark Houston

More articles in Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:46:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11747-017-0561-6