A meta-analytic review of influence strategies in marketing channel relationships
Wesley James Johnston (),
Angelina Nhat-Hanh Le and
Julian Ming-Sung Cheng ()
Additional contact information
Wesley James Johnston: Georgia State University
Julian Ming-Sung Cheng: National Central University
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2018, vol. 46, issue 4, No 6, 674-702
Abstract:
Abstract Influence strategies (ISs) are a dominant topic in channel research. However, the literature lacks a consensus on when noncoercive and coercive strategies are more valuable or damaging to partnership quality, and their judicious applications remain unclear. Mainly based on social exchange perspectives, we review and conceptualize several contingency factors in the IS-partnership quality relationships in this metaanalysis. The moderating results generally suggest that the stronger positive impacts of noncoercive ISs result from a higher appreciation for supportive attempts, whereas the higher negative sensitivity to coercive ISs can be attributed to the low acceptability of forceful influences. We determine degrees of appreciation and acceptability by the perceived significance of benefits/damages, expectations, and tolerance levels for both strategies. Also, we synthesize and meta-analyze the key outcomes and antecedents of both strategies in an integrated framework. The direct-effect results indicate that the choice of effectively applying both strategies necessitates a tradeoff between goals and priorities.
Keywords: Distribution; Channels; Influence strategies; Power; Non-coercive/coercive; Meta-analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-017-0564-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:46:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11747-017-0564-3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... gement/journal/11747
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-017-0564-3
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science is currently edited by John Hulland, Anne Hoekman and Mark Houston
More articles in Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().