Riskiness for sets of gambles
Moti Michaeli
Economic Theory, 2014, vol. 56, issue 3, 515-547
Abstract:
Aumann–Serrano (J Polit Econ 116:810–836, 2008 ) and Foster–Hart (J Polit Econ 117:785–814, 2009 ) suggest two new riskiness measures, each of which enables one to elicit a complete and objective ranking of gambles according to their riskiness. These riskiness measures were created with a risky world in mind, but not an uncertain one. We apply similar arguments to models of decision under uncertainty and develop complete and objective rankings of sets of gambles, which arise naturally in many such models. Clearly, these results extend the previous riskiness measures, and they have a natural interpretation in terms of those measures even when uncertainty does play a significant role. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Keywords: Riskiness measures; Decision under uncertainty; Risk and uncertainty; Sets of gambles; D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00199-014-0802-6 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Riskiness for sets of gambles (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joecth:v:56:y:2014:i:3:p:515-547
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... eory/journal/199/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-014-0802-6
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Theory is currently edited by Nichoals Yanneils
More articles in Economic Theory from Springer, Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().