Contract withdrawals and equilibrium in competitive markets with adverse selection
Wanda Mimra () and
Achim Wambach
Additional contact information
Wanda Mimra: ETH Zurich
Economic Theory, 2019, vol. 67, issue 4, No 5, 875-907
Abstract:
Abstract In competitive common value adverse selection markets, existence of a pure strategy equilibrium is often justified by appealing to Wilson’s (J Econ Theory 16(2):167–207, 1977) concept of ‘anticipatory equilibrium.’ The anticipatory equilibrium is based on the notion that all market participants expect unprofitable contracts to be withdrawn. We present a model of individual contract withdrawals that captures the strategic process underlying the anticipatory equilibrium concept: We introduce an additional—endogenously ending—stage into the Rothschild and Stiglitz (Q J Econ 90(4):629–649, 1976) model in which initial contracts can be withdrawn repeatedly after observation of competitors’ contract offers and withdrawals. Individual contract withdrawal allows for a rich strategic interaction. We show that an equilibrium exists where consumers obtain their respective second-best efficient Miyazaki–Wilson–Spence (MWS) contracts. However, this equilibrium requires latent contracts on offer. Furthermore, any individually rational and incentive-compatible allocation that earns nonnegative profits on aggregate can be sustained as equilibrium allocation. We further allow for contract addition as in Riley’s (Econometrica 47(2):331–359, 1979) ‘reactive equilibrium.’ Allowing for contract addition does not change the set of possible outcomes.
Keywords: Asymmetric information; Competitive insurance market; Contract withdrawal (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D82 G22 L10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00199-018-1101-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joecth:v:67:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00199-018-1101-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... eory/journal/199/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-018-1101-4
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Theory is currently edited by Nichoals Yanneils
More articles in Economic Theory from Springer, Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().