Agent-wise–replication invariance, the Walrasian solution and the uniform rule
William Thomson ()
Additional contact information
William Thomson: University of Rochester
Economic Theory, 2025, vol. 79, issue 2, No 1, 357-377
Abstract:
Abstract We consider classical problems of fair division and generalize the standard requirement on solution mappings known as “replication invariance”. Consider an economy and an allocation chosen by a solution for it. Allowing the replication parameter to vary from agent to agent, we correspondingly adjust the social endowment so that it be possible to assign to each agent and their clone(s) what the agent has been assigned at the allocation under consideration. We require that this list of assignments be chosen by the solution mapping for the resulting economy . We show various ways in which this property is related to other properties that have been discussed in the literature on economic design. We characterize the “Walrasian solution operated from equal division” on the basis of efficiency, the equal-division-lower-bound, and this property, thereby obtaining an analog of the Debreu, Scarf (Int Econ Rev 4:235–246, 1963) convergence theorem in which the no-blocking requirements that define the core are replaced by the equal-division-lower-bound. For the problem of allocating a social endowment of a single commodity among a group of agents with single-peaked preferences (Sprumont in Econometrica 59:509–519, 1991), we characterize the so-called “uniform rule” in a similar way.
Keywords: Replication invariance; Agent-wise–replication invariance; Classical problems of fair division; Walrasian solution; Allocation with single-peaked preferences; Uniform rule (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D50 D60 D63 D71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00199-024-01594-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joecth:v:79:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s00199-024-01594-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... eory/journal/199/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-024-01594-5
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Theory is currently edited by Nichoals Yanneils
More articles in Economic Theory from Springer, Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().