Schumpeter and Goodwin
Hardy Hanappi ()
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2015, vol. 25, issue 1, 277-291
Abstract:
This paper compares the essential theoretical works of Joseph Schumpeter and Richard Goodwin. Though it also describes some biographical details of their overlapping lifetimes, the main focus is on the relation between their theoretical contributions. It is concluded that their role as theoretical mavericks challenging mainstream economics mirrors the methodological approach of evolutionary economics: progress needs the singular and unconventional challenge of innovators. Their long-lasting influence still is exerted by the scholars they influenced during their last period of activity. As well as showing several similarities the paper also discusses the essential differences between Schumpeter’s and Goodwin’s theoretical positions – in particular with respect to the works of Marx and Keynes. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Keywords: Schumpeter; Goodwin; Evolutionary methodology; History of economic thought (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00191-014-0390-4 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joevec:v:25:y:2015:i:1:p:277-291
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/191/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-014-0390-4
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Evolutionary Economics is currently edited by Uwe Cantner, Elias Dinopoulos, Horst Hanusch and Luigi Orsenigo
More articles in Journal of Evolutionary Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().