EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Entrepreneurial cyclical dynamics of open innovation

JinHyo Joseph Yun (), DongKyu Won () and KyungBae Park ()
Additional contact information
JinHyo Joseph Yun: Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST)
DongKyu Won: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI)
KyungBae Park: Sangji University

Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2018, vol. 28, issue 5, 1151-1174

Abstract: Abstract This study addresses the following matters: What is the structure and mechanism of modern capital economic dynamics that motivates the growth limits of capitalism? The modern economy can be modeled as Entrepreneurial Cyclical Dynamics of Open Innovation with three sub-economies such as market open innovation by SMEs and start-ups, closed open innovation by big business, and social open innovation. When there is low balance among the three sub-economies, which is to say, if any of the sub-economies is too big, or too small, the economy dynamics decreases, and the economic growth rate slows down to nearly zero or even negative according to the model simulation. South Korea, with a low internal reserve policy, is in this situation. When there is medium balance among three sub-economies, which is to say, any of the sub-economies is big enough to lead the total economy but is not sufficiently big to control totally the other two economies, the economy dynamics increases and the economic growth rate will be maintained at a high level according to the model simulation. India, with its grassroots innovation festival, demonstrates this situation. When there is a high balance among the three sub-economies, which is to say, the three sub-economies are well balanced and there is no change in the economic system, the economy dynamics become too low and the economic growth rate stays at a low level according to the model simulation. Japan’s Hitachi is moving from this situation to a medium balance.

Keywords: Entrepreneurial cyclical dynamics; Market open innovation; Closed open innovation; Social open innovation; New combination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00191-018-0596-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joevec:v:28:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s00191-018-0596-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/191/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Evolutionary Economics is currently edited by Uwe Cantner, Elias Dinopoulos, Horst Hanusch and Luigi Orsenigo

More articles in Journal of Evolutionary Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2019-05-21
Handle: RePEc:spr:joevec:v:28:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s00191-018-0596-y