Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

Kristof Bosmans and Luc Lauwers

International Journal of Game Theory, 2011, vol. 40, issue 4, 807 pages

Keywords: Claims problem; Bankruptcy; Taxation; Lorenz dominance; Proportional rule; Constrained equal awards rule; Constrained equal losses rule; Talmud rule; Piniles’ rule; Constrained egalitarian rule; Adjusted proportional rule; Random arrival rule; Minimal overlap rule; D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (41)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00182-010-0269-z (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims (2011)
Working Paper: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jogath:v:40:y:2011:i:4:p:791-807

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... eory/journal/182/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00182-010-0269-z

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Game Theory is currently edited by Shmuel Zamir, Vijay Krishna and Bernhard von Stengel

More articles in International Journal of Game Theory from Springer, Game Theory Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().