Machine learning model to predict welding quality using air-coupled acoustic emission and weld inputs

Kaiser Asif, Lu Zhang (), Sybil Derrible, J. Ernesto Indacochea, Didem Ozevin and Brian Ziebart
Additional contact information
Kaiser Asif: University of Illinois at Chicago
Lu Zhang: Guilin University of Technology
Sybil Derrible: University of Illinois at Chicago
J. Ernesto Indacochea: University of Illinois at Chicago
Didem Ozevin: University of Illinois at Chicago
Brian Ziebart: University of Illinois at Chicago

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2022, vol. 33, issue 3, No 17, 895 pages

Abstract: Abstract Weld evaluation processes are usually conducted in the post-weld stage. In this way, defects are found after the weld is completed, often resulting in disposal of expensive material or lengthy repair processes. Simultaneously, weld quality inspections tend to be performed manually by a human, even for an automated weld. Therefore, a proper real-time weld quality monitoring method associated with a decision-making strategy is needed to increase the productivity and automaticity in weld. In this study, acoustic emission (AE) as a real-time monitoring method is introduced for gas metal arc weld. The AE system is designed to cover a wide range of frequencies from 5 to 400 kHz. Additionally, the welding parameters (weld current, voltage, gas flow rate, and heat input) are recorded concurrently with AE. Different types of weld defects are artificially created to generate different signals. For the automated decision-making system, machine learning algorithms are used. Several features extracted from the AE and welding parameters feed into a machine learning algorithm. A new AE feature as the rate of AE energy accumulation extracted from time driven AE feature is defined. For decision-making, supervised learning models are trained and evaluated using testing data. General classification methods—such as Logistic Regression—predict each data-point separately. In this study, Adversarial Sequence Tagging method is applied to predict the presence of four weld states as good, excessive penetration, burn-through, porosity and porosity-excessive penetration. We explore the prediction task as a sequence tagging problem where the label of a data-point depends on its corresponding features as well as neighboring labels. When all the AE features as well as heat input are used in the feature set, the sequence tagging and logistic regression algorithms achieve a prediction accuracy of 91.18% and 82.35%, respectively, as compared to metallographic analysis.

Keywords: Gas metal arc welding; Acoustic emission; Machine learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01667-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01667-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10845

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01667-x

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing is currently edited by Andrew Kusiak

More articles in Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().