Universal Alignment Probability Revisited

Z. Shen, Q. C. Zhao (), Q.-S. Jia and J. Sun
Additional contact information
Z. Shen: Tsinghua University
Q. C. Zhao: Tsinghua University
Q.-S. Jia: Tsinghua University
J. Sun: Tsinghua University

Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2009, vol. 141, issue 2, No 8, 376 pages

Abstract: Abstract We found a minor error in the proof of paper “Universal Alignment Probability Revisited” by S.Y. Lin and Y.C. Ho (J. Optim. Theory Appl. 113(2):399–407, 2002). In this note, we give a counterexample and explain the reason. We also show that the conclusion of that paper is still correct despite this minor error. A new proof of the conclusion is given.

Keywords: Ordinal optimization; Alignment probability; Good enough subset; Selected subset (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-008-9498-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joptap:v:141:y:2009:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-008-9498-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10957/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10957-008-9498-8

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications is currently edited by Franco Giannessi and David G. Hull

More articles in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().