EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Robust n-Agent Heterogeneous Investment-Consumption Game Under $$\alpha $$ α -Maxmin Mean-Variance-Utility Criterion

Guohui Guan () and Zongxia Liang ()
Additional contact information
Guohui Guan: Renmin University of China
Zongxia Liang: Tsinghua University

Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2026, vol. 208, issue 1, No 7, 38 pages

Abstract: Abstract This paper investigates a robust heterogeneous n-agent stochastic differential game under a mean-variance-utility criterion, where agents compete based on relative performance in the presence of model uncertainty. Model uncertainty is represented by a set of equivalent probability measures, with Novikov’s condition imposed to guarantee their mutual equivalence. Ambiguity attitudes are characterized by the $$\alpha $$ α -maxmin model. Agents invest and consume in a financial market exposed to both common and idiosyncratic risks, aiming to maximize relative terminal wealth with the mean-variance criterion and the expected utility of relative consumption under the $$\alpha $$ α -maxmin model. We formulate a heterogeneous game that emphasizes outperforming a specific group of competitors. Agents focus on a weighted average of their peers’ wealth and consumption. This optimization problem is inherently time-inconsistent, and we derive the associated extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman-Isaacs (HJBI) equations within a game-theoretic framework. The robust best response strategies are composed of a myopic component and another component that reacts to the actions of other agents. We obtain closed-form solutions for the robust Nash equilibrium investment-consumption strategies through a system of linear equations. This paper explores how levels of ambiguity, ambiguity aversion, risk aversion, and competition affect Nash equilibrium strategies, uncovering the herd effect that competition has on agents’ strategies.

Keywords: Robust stochastic differential game; $$\alpha $$ α -maxmin; Mean-variance; Utility; Equilibrium strategies; 91G10; 91A15; 49L20; 91G80 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-025-02834-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joptap:v:208:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-025-02834-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10957/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10957-025-02834-x

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications is currently edited by Franco Giannessi and David G. Hull

More articles in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-10-11
Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:208:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-025-02834-x