Speaking Up: How Patient and Physician Voices Shaped a Trial to Improve Goals-of-Care Discussions

Rachel Solomon (), Cardinale Smith, Jay Kallio, Amy Fenollosa, Barbara Benerofe, Laurence Jones, Kerin Adelson, Jason P. Gonsky, Carolyn Messner and Nina A. Bickell
Additional contact information
Rachel Solomon: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Cardinale Smith: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Kerin Adelson: Yale University School of Medicine, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven
Jason P. Gonsky: SUNY Downstate Medical School
Carolyn Messner: CancerCare
Nina A. Bickell: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2017, vol. 10, issue 4, No 11, 489-501

Abstract: Abstract Background Patients with advanced cancer benefit from early goals-of-care (GoC) conversations, but few facilitators are known. Objective We describe the process and outcomes of involving patient and physician stakeholders in the design and development of a trial, funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), to enhance oncologists’ communication skills and their propensity to facilitate productive, meaningful GoC discussions with patients with advanced cancer. Methods We recruited oncologists, palliative care physicians, and patient stakeholders to participate in proposal development, intervention design and modification, identification of outcome measures, and refinement of study tools. Formats for exchange included 1:1 structured interviews, workshops, and stakeholder meetings. Results Patient and physician voices helped craft and implement a study of an intervention to enhance oncologists’ ability to facilitate GoC discussions with patients with advanced cancer. Physician inputs guided the creation of an oncologist and palliative care physician “joint visit” intervention at a turning point in disease management. Patient inputs impacted on the language used, outcome measures assessed, and approaches used to introduce patients to the intervention visit. Conclusions Stakeholder input informed the development of a novel intervention that physicians seemed to find both valuable and in sync with their needs and their practice schedules. Where communication about difficult subjects and shared decision making are involved, including multiple stakeholder groups in study design, implementation, and outcomes measurement may have far-reaching effects.

Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0226-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0226-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0226-z

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().