A Hierarchical Bayes Approach to Modeling Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice Experiments: An Application to Public Preferences for Prenatal Screening

Tima Mohammadi, Wei Zhang, Julie Sou, Sylvie Langlois, Sarah Munro and Aslam H. Anis ()
Additional contact information
Tima Mohammadi: St. Paul’s Hospital
Wei Zhang: St. Paul’s Hospital
Julie Sou: St. Paul’s Hospital
Sylvie Langlois: University of British Columbia
Sarah Munro: St. Paul’s Hospital
Aslam H. Anis: St. Paul’s Hospital

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2020, vol. 13, issue 2, No 7, 223 pages

Abstract: Abstract Background Previous studies assessing preferences for prenatal screening have focused on preferences of the affected population and have largely assumed homogeneous preferences. We aimed to estimate public preferences and willingness to pay for prenatal screening and diagnosis from a Canadian general population sample, and to model preferences at the individual level. Methods A discrete choice experiment was used to elicit preferences for different aspects of prenatal screening and diagnostic strategies. Strategies differed in five attributes: timing of the results, false-negative rate, false-positive rate, risk of miscarriage, and out-of-pocket cost. Respondents made forced and unforced choices using a dual response approach. Hierarchical Bayes analysis was applied to estimate individual-level part-worth utilities. Individual probability and expected uptake of prenatal screening under different scenarios were also assessed. Subgroup analyses were conducted using individual-level preferences. Results The final analyses were based on a sample of 4601 respondents. Results showed that the two most important attributes were false-negative rate and miscarriage risk. There was significant heterogeneity in preferences among respondents. Individuals’ perception of the risk of pregnancy with chromosomal abnormalities affected their preferences for screening. The relatively high uptake of safe and accurate screening among all groups of respondents indicated people’s desire for information about the health of their unborn baby regardless of their decision to continue the pregnancy. Conclusion Our findings are consistent with previous studies based on affected-population preferences. This concordance should be reassuring from a policy perspective and can inform the design of publicly funded prenatal screening programs.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-019-00402-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-019-00402-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00402-w

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().